Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zoltan's avatar

My understanding is that the young King conceded to the demands, under instruction of his advisers, but had no intention of keeping his word. The Royal side instigated the violence, on some pretext (probably an agent provocateur) and always intended to kill Wat Tyler. This story plays out for a number of similar uprisings. Kill the main leader, seize those around him, and then it falls apart.

In fact we can see this playbook being used even today (just look at a certain country in the levant which consistently kills the leaders of opposing forces). Provoke, isolate, behead (metaphorically or literally), eliminate, then instigate disproportionate reprisals. It's classic ruthless enforcement of control.

Expand full comment
Nathan Knopp's avatar

I'm looking for FEEDBACK on this essay!

Let me know what you think in the text box above...

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts