Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Renée Menéndez's avatar

"This banking trick allowed them to call into existence the vast pools of money that financed the Industrial Revolution."

This requires clarification. It wasn't "vast pools of money" that fractional reserves created, but rather credit relationships. There wasn't enough gold available to finance all investments. The crucial point was the realization that credit relationships processed through banks largely cancel each other out by offsetting the outstanding claims. The fact that offsetting makes the actual availability of gold unnecessary is the real reason for the development of fractional reserve banking. It was a stopgap solution that turned out to be a fundamental innovation for banking.

"Entrepreneurs borrow money from banks in this system, and then repay their loans by bringing labor-saving technologies to market."

While this is often claimed, it ignores the question of how higher productivity is supposed to generate more money. Of course, gold can also be extracted in greater quantities through advanced extraction methods, but this doesn't apply to the Spinning Jenny. It brings more goods to market, but not more money to buy them. Marx formulated this in the second volume of Capital: "How can entrepreneurs extract 600 pounds from circulation when they have only put 500 pounds in?" Mainstream economics avoids precisely this question by stylizing marginal productivities as the remuneration of the factors of production. The question "How is profit generated?" (and consequently, interest) is addressed by very few economists. Keynes's answer of promoting capacity utilization through government debt is possible in the short term, but creates its own problems because government debt is systematically not repaid.

Regarding the "Delusion of Individuality," I have previously referred to Dugin's fourth political theory, which focuses on Heidegger's "society-focused Dasein."

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?